Ranked by money made, not by how often it was right
Paper only · no order is ever placed
Trader 10 +4090% to Trader 2 -2256%
10007 closed trades across 8 desks.
1Trader 10+4089.74%
4533 closed38% win rate1720W / 2730L
25 trades entered under ₹0.50 set aside — not a fillable price
most often: thesis invalidated (3225)
2Trader 9+3913.40%
1186 closed42% win rate501W / 672L
20 trades entered under ₹0.50 set aside — not a fillable price
most often: thesis invalidated (1026)
3Trader 11+79.61%
46 closed52% win rate24W / 22L
most often: target (20)
4unknown+0.00%
1 closed0% win rate0W / 0L
INSUFFICIENT DATA
1 closed trade — too few to judge on.
most often: admin lane merge close (1)
5Trader 7-64.28%
400 closed39% win rate157W / 230L
₹-218 on the lots it sized
most often: thesis invalidated (231)
6Trader 8-105.57%
220 closed37% win rate82W / 135L
2 trades entered under ₹0.50 set aside — not a fillable price · ₹+10,388 on the lots it sized
most often: money stop (130)
7Seller Hunter-703.26%
1956 closed41% win rate800W / 1140L
most often: thesis invalidated (630)
8Trader 2-2256.01%
1665 closed36% win rate592W / 1063L
4 trades entered under ₹0.50 set aside — not a fillable price · ₹-511,840 on the lots it sized
most often: money stop (758)
When they did not trade
Seller Hunter45% acted on
868 views193 traded238 stood aside
92past 15:15 IST entry cutoff
89no archetype fired (8 checked)
18no archetype fired (11 checked)
Trader 1028% acted on
510 views85 traded216 stood aside
172status=NO_SIGNAL — Trader 9 has no tradeable setup
44past 15:15 IST entry cutoff
Trader 922% acted on
204 views30 traded109 stood aside
105status=NO_SIGNAL — Trader 9 has no tradeable setup
4past 15:15 IST entry cutoff
Trader 70% acted on
179 views0 traded179 stood aside
150status=NO_SIGNAL — Trader 9 has no tradeable setup
10status=WAITING — Kimi has no tradeable setup
6status=NO_SIGNAL — Sensex desk has no tradeable setup
Effectively switched off — it forms views and almost never acts on them.
Trader 80% acted on
16 views0 traded16 stood aside
12verdict already consumed
2lean=NEUTRAL — second brain AI has no direction
1favorability=UNFAVORABLE — second brain AI says a buyer should not act
Trader 20% acted on
2 views0 traded2 stood aside
2no gamma profile this cycle
A desk that stands aside through a winning session scores
the same in the trade book as one that never got a signal. This is the
difference: how often each desk formed a view, how often it acted, and
the reason it gave when it did not.
What Trader 8 has learned
Nothing refused yet — from 210 of its own closed trades across 40 sessions.
direction · BULLISHFavoured
88 trades · 27 sessions · +17.2% mean · 33% win
88 trades over 27 sessions averaged +17.2%. Reported only — this module never sizes a trade up.
direction · BEARISHNeutral
120 trades · 34 sessions · +0.1% mean · 38% win
120 trades over 34 sessions averaged +0.1% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
favorability · FAVORABLENeutral
51 trades · 20 sessions · +2.5% mean · 51% win
51 trades over 20 sessions averaged +2.5% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
favorability · MARGINALNeutral
24 trades · 18 sessions · -1.1% mean · 25% win
24 trades over 18 sessions averaged -1.1% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
gamma regime · NEGATIVE_GAMMANeutral
30 trades · 18 sessions · +1.9% mean · 47% win
30 trades over 18 sessions averaged +1.9% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
gamma regime · POSITIVE_GAMMANeutral
45 trades · 21 sessions · +1.1% mean · 40% win
45 trades over 21 sessions averaged +1.1% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
readiness · BUILDINGNeutral
29 trades · 20 sessions · -0.9% mean · 28% win
29 trades over 20 sessions averaged -0.9% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
readiness · IMMINENTNeutral
46 trades · 19 sessions · +2.8% mean · 52% win
46 trades over 19 sessions averaged +2.8% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
verdict age · fresh (<15m)Neutral
64 trades · 28 sessions · +2.2% mean · 45% win
64 trades over 28 sessions averaged +2.2% — inside the noise band, no edge either way.
verdict age · aging (15-30m)Insufficient Sample
6 trades · 5 sessions · -5.0% mean · 17% win
6 closed trade(s); 20 needed before this means anything. Currently -5.0% mean.
verdict age · stale (>30m)Insufficient Sample
5 trades · 4 sessions · -1.9% mean · 40% win
5 closed trade(s); 20 needed before this means anything. Currently -1.9% mean.
It only flags a setup its own record convicts: 20+ closed trades under that exact condition, spread over 5+ different sessions, averaging worse than −3%. Below that it says so and does nothing — twelve trades at 33% is not a finding, it is a Tuesday.
Record only. Nothing is ever refused: it logs what its own history would have declined, and Trader 8 trades on regardless.
How to read this
Net, not win rate. A desk can be right most of the
time and still lose money — it happens whenever the losses are bigger than
the wins, which is the standard way an option buyer goes broke while
feeling correct. Rows are ranked on money.
Insufficient data means insufficient data. A lane
under 20 closed trades is dimmed and labelled. Two
wins out of two is a 100% win rate and it is not evidence.
The curve is that lane's running net, oldest trade
on the left. The dashed line is zero. It is a record of what happened, not
a projection of what comes next.
Every trade here is paper. No order has ever been placed by
this system, by design.